Market data · Through Q2 2026

What assets like yours are clearing at.

Benchmarks for middle-market technology transactions, with the methodology set out in full so you can judge how much weight they deserve.

Revenue multiples by vertical

Median trailing-revenue multiple for middle-market assets. Divestitures.com analysis of publicly reported transactions, through Q2 2026.

0x2x4x6x8xAI & ML PlatformsCybersecurityVertical B2B SaaSFinTech InfrastructureHealthcare TechnologyHR & Workforce TechEnterprise SoftwareEdTech6.5x5.4x4.6x4.2x4.0x3.4x3.1x2.6x
Table view
VerticalMedianRangeEBITDAActive acquirers
AI & ML Platforms6.5x4.5x – 11.0x16xStrategic acquirers, growth equity
Cybersecurity5.4x3.8x – 8.0x15xPlatform strategics, sponsor-backed consolidators
Vertical B2B SaaS4.6x3.2x – 7.0x13xPrivate equity, vertical consolidators
FinTech Infrastructure4.2x3.0x – 6.5x12xPayments strategics, financial sponsors
Healthcare Technology4.0x2.8x – 6.0x12xHealthcare strategics, specialist sponsors
HR & Workforce Tech3.4x2.4x – 5.0x11xHCM platforms, private equity
Enterprise Software3.1x2.2x – 4.5x10xPrivate equity, legacy consolidators
EdTech2.6x1.8x – 4.0x9xEducation strategics, family offices
Methodology

Where these numbers come from.

Compiled from technology transactions with publicly disclosed terms in the $50M–$500M enterprise value range. Multiples are stated on trailing revenue for recurring-revenue businesses. Private carve-outs regularly transact outside these ranges. Perimeter, retention and buyer competition move the number more than sector does. Treat these as orientation, not as a valuation.

Source: Divestitures.com analysis of publicly reported transactions. These are not proprietary transaction records and not an appraisal. Any single asset can and does transact well outside these bands.

A benchmark is not a valuation.

Perimeter, retention and the number of credible bidders explain far more of the variance in achieved price than sector does. A specific answer for a specific asset means looking at the asset.

What is moving

Six things shaping middle-market technology M&A.

Carve-out supply is rising

Corporates are shedding non-core software divisions to redirect capital toward AI. That widens the field for sellers who are prepared and punishes those who are not. Buyers can afford to be selective about which processes they engage with.

The AI premium is narrowing to real moats

Assets with proprietary training data and defensible model IP still clear at a premium. Products that wrap a public model no longer do, and buyers now diligence the difference directly.

Retention decides the multiple

Net revenue retention is now the strongest single predictor of the multiple achieved in this size band, with a wider spread than sector, growth rate or gross margin.

Sponsors hold record dry powder

Committed but undeployed private equity capital remains at historic highs, with a heavy technology allocation. Well-positioned middle-market assets usually draw several qualified bidders.

Cross-border interest keeps widening

European and APAC sponsors and strategics are active in the US middle market. A properly run process reaches them. A quiet conversation with one familiar buyer does not.

Clean assets are getting clean terms

Earnouts appear less often in competitive processes. Sellers who arrive with audited financials and a clear standalone cost base convert more of the headline number into cash at close.

Confidential inquiry

Every mandate startswith one conversation.

Tell us what you are considering. A senior advisor from FIH will come back with a straight read on value, timing and who would actually buy it, before you commit to anything.

  • Confidential. Nothing you share leaves the advisory team.
  • Success-based. No retainer, no upfront fees, no obligation.
  • A senior FIH advisor responds within one business day.

We never share your information, and we do not add you to a marketing list without asking.